tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post5098461495824625364..comments2024-03-07T00:40:45.585-08:00Comments on Trout Clan Campfire: THE LATEST INSANITYmurph & freeacrehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10278932450332333778noreply@blogger.comBlogger56125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-78262943831396251042013-01-06T14:26:01.002-08:002013-01-06T14:26:01.002-08:00continued...
we can debate the existence of said ...<br />continued...<br /><br />we can debate the existence of said creator but fact remains, thats the sin qua non principle upon which this country was founded. and, the argument that there is no such thing as a benefactor notwithstanding, the words of our founders declared this benefactor to be a self-evident truth. even his enemy, the king, could not deny such a truth least he deny his own legitimacy and, by definition, that of his country's heritage. suffice to say such a legitimacy is claimed by nearly every side on every war ever fought who all proclaimed to fight those wars, as dylan put it, 'with god on our side'.<br /><br />point being there's overwhelming precedent for the argument that most peoples, despite the appearance of extreme differences, believe in the existence of a benefactor as their creator. no one, no side, no extreme, not even those who call themselves atheist, can prove a damn thing to support their belief. therein lay a commonality. most digress to their beliefs that they exist due to a higher scheme. another commonality. such a commonality is in the vast majority. <br /><br />this then begs an even deeper question: did this same creator, to which our founders attributed the self-evident truth and certain unalienable rights, then abandon mankind of his further benevolence and leave it to mankind to flounder helplessly, powerlessly, in the misery of one man or group of men vying for power over another least he may not survive? or is there more bestowed upon man in the way of human potential to rise above his vulnerabilities to be taken down? to be rendered helpless to suppression by anyone who would seek to, and gain power and position to, control him against his will without his expressed permission?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-58232120877485761202013-01-06T14:24:50.194-08:002013-01-06T14:24:50.194-08:00murph... and it appears to you that RP and i have ...murph... and it appears to you that RP and i have come down on the side of the shruggers and helpless? RP has spoken for himself and so it should be. my only comment to that is, so what else is new? nothing! except that the current tech created by that same will of the people does not lay under his control. any combined will of the people to rally to defend themselves has never faced such an opposition to it. buttons now exist to take him down in a heartbeat in ways we can't even imagine. sats point on starwars is just one example. frankly, it may not even be necessary to push any of those buttons. just leave him to take themselves down.<br /><br />as for me, we are helpless only to the extent of this conundrum of an entire peoples powerless to take up arms against the man as a possible solution to re-claiming our personal soverignty given the present reality. to do so is a form of attempting to do exactly what is being done to him. figuratively, the guy with the biggest gun wins. once again, the political principle of a self governing people is being called to question. we could say that this time its different cuz the man is our own. 240 years ago when the founders made the causality declaration it was no dif. the man who sought to suppress and hold power over them was their own. an ocean removed but still their own. until they declared otherwise a year later. thus my argument that such manifestations are re-enactments of underlying, unresolved energetic dynamics.<br /><br />i've argued ever since coming to this campfire that the system is not the problem. and argued as well, that gov is not the prob. if we want to put it into the context of blame (and we usually do) then, people are the problem. i've argued further that, the condition of systems, govs, and so on are glaring reflections of the condition of the peoples. but hey, nobody gives that much credibility either. i see the same shrugs and resignation to helplessness that you see when you ask for alternative ideas to the system. i hear the same self-limiting, defeating judgement from almost everyone that the reality is that nothing can be done about the human condition. the evidence for the validity of the conclusion being that nothing has ever been done in that regard. we have been and probably always will be a collective we call humanity where one vies for power over another in the name of survival. and when it comes right down to it each will move to kill his neighbor to preserve himself. such is anything but in alignment with the idea of sustaining life inside of love. it was only made to look like that and thus, the con game. nearly everyone has bought into it.<br /><br />walking hand in hand with that attitude is a staunch smugness that, any suggestion that mankind was not left to flounder in a continuous war for power of one man over another or one group over another by its benefactor as the only means to that survival, is, at best, laughable. at worst, an unprovable, fallacious, and merely subjective POV. yet, when it comes to this country at least, these same peoples' ancestors were all in on the idea that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.<br /><br />(to hell with the character limit)<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-84522088487222345512013-01-06T12:16:50.555-08:002013-01-06T12:16:50.555-08:00SATS
Just a couple of observations Murph, one or ...SATS<br /><br />Just a couple of observations Murph, one or two of which I have voiced before. <br /><br />Country areas could be controlled by beam weapons from space. I believe Russia has been giving Canadians sleepless nights for many years now and I am sure the US has been doing similar. The ones I heard about were bounced from the ionosphere over the pole but I expect satellites could do a similar job. Probably there is lots about the Starwars project that did not see the light of day. <br /><br />The Jews in the Polish ghettos that were armed apparently fared a lot better than those that were not. <br /><br />In wars which the USG has indulged itself over the last hundred years the object was not to prevail but to prolong. What is required is a rolling stalemate. Victory does not sell armaments. Remember about war being a racket. It is common knowledge that in the second Gulf War for example, Rummy would not give our boys the tools to finish the job. A short term loss for a long term gain is never a bad deal. Jeez, if they ever won anything they would have to take some sort of responsibility for it and that is the last thing they want. If they truly want control, the modern trend of fostering civil strife is a preferable method. <br /><br />I know you guys are the ones with the more immediate problem but do you ever give a thought to the deteriorating economic situation in Europe? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-47291335303697984582013-01-06T11:51:13.723-08:002013-01-06T11:51:13.723-08:00Murph; The fact that gun and ammunition sales hav...Murph; The fact that gun and ammunition sales have accelerated since the latest false flag in CT is a testament of American will. It's a vote, of sorts, and a line in the sand. If you listen to the voices of older law enforcement officers who are coming forward on various talk radio shows, the consensus I'm hearing is that clear divisions are appearing among both LE and the military.<br /><br />I heard one officer characterize the situation, (and I'm certain this is an over-simplification, but also, accurate to a degree,) that the people he serves with are in two camps. One group is comprised of "the droid-heads" who are gung-ho types, pumped-up on steroids and willing to carry out any orders. The other group remembers its original objective, which was to honor its oath and serve and protect the American people.<br /><br />I woke this morning thinking, though Palooka's point of federal government military superiority is undeniable, still, the government is afraid of us. Otherwise, why do they keep lying, and obfuscating the truth? What's the point, if they can take us any time?<br /><br />Then, as you suggested above, I am reminded of the many successful resistance movements we've engaged, and eventually wearied of until collective will ran out and we simply withdrew, having accomplished nothing but bolstering our weapons industries.<br /><br />Will we end up good serfs by day, and resistance fighters by night? Will the temperature be turned up so slowly under us, that most will remain oblivious to the threat until it's too late? We shall see.<br /><br />As you are fond of saying, prediction is troublesome. But, my gut says people don't buy guns and ammo in Jan. with the intent of surrendering those same arms in March and April.rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-14588821971354072202013-01-06T09:54:38.765-08:002013-01-06T09:54:38.765-08:00Palooka and Rockpicker,
The arguments you put for...Palooka and Rockpicker,<br /><br />The arguments you put forth I run into all the time. These arguments for gun control morph into the context that if we think, as civilians, that we can go up against the U.S. military might we are kidding ourselves and therefore, the idea of an armed civilian population to stop a tyrannical government is stupid and self defeating. When I ask what is the alternative, they shrug their shoulders or talk about working within the system to change the system. I have had presented to me that there is nothing wrong with the system that a few tweaks in key areas won't solve. <br /><br />Now, my picture of "the system" says those arguments are just plain nonsense. If it was possible to change the system from the inside, it would have been done already. <br /><br />I think it really comes down to on the bottom line is; What are folks willing to live with or under? I think we have enough data now that positively shows that those in power are being successful in paring down individual freedoms of the population while retaining those freedoms for the power folks. Almost all efforts to reverse this has not worked. If this continues, the population will quite literally be serfs, slaves, to the power elite with little or no meaningful freedom of decision on how to live their lives. Private property will be rented to the population and can be taken away at will, you will not own anything of importance at all. When an individual bothers to look critically at the last 50 year trend this becomes very obvious that this is the goal. <br /><br />Most of our population is concentrated in high density urban areas and to some extent into the suburban areas. This country is large in land mass and a radically variable terrain. Do we actually have a military large enough and dedicated enough to try and suppress all of it? We probably have enough to suppress most of the the high population urban centers. But all of it under determined resistance? <br /><br />If the goal of the PTB was to pacify all of the smaller countries we have engaged in war over the last 100 years, all of smaller land mass, all of lower population, they have failed. The carnage on both sides was extreme but the countries were not pacified, that is, completely bent to the will of the PTB with no further resistance. <br /><br />The question I ask, is the American public willing and able to offer significant resistance to what I would consider an untenable state of living, that of being a serf, a slave to the desires of the PTB. If they aren't, I do not see any kind of happy future coming down the road. If the majority of folks are willing to live that way, just to be alive, we are doomed.murphnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-36377177905218121972013-01-05T23:40:46.678-08:002013-01-05T23:40:46.678-08:00P; You raise some good points, and when consideri...P; You raise some good points, and when considering the situation rationally, I would have to agree with you. Our position appears to be hopeless.<br /><br />But then, I remember the dire straits our forebears found themselves in, having dared defy the King of England, and his army. I'm not sure I can imagine the bravery it took to stand up to the Crown, and believe the revolt had a chance of success.<br /><br />Yet, men and women of courage, with good and just intent, did believe. They stood up. They said "no." And, by God, they succeeded.<br /><br />It's a real shame these assholes have brought us to this point, but the fact of the matter is, conditions are deteriorating under this current system, and no political will for remediation seems to exist anywhere.<br /><br />The only answer offered by those who govern us is to demand more control. Isn't that what Chancellor Hitler told the Germans?<br /><br />I think the time is quickly approaching when all of us will have to decide whether to go along to get along, or to actively, if carefully, resist. <br /><br />William O. Douglas said this:<br /><br />As nightfall<br />does not fall at once,<br />nor falls oppression.<br />With both<br />there is a twilight<br />when all remains unchanged.<br />It's in such twilight<br />we all must be aware<br />of change in the air,<br />however slight,<br />lest we become<br />unwitting victims<br />of the night.<br /><br />Man, what's a mo'fo' t'do? rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-49171854331183418002013-01-05T21:10:28.728-08:002013-01-05T21:10:28.728-08:00rp... exactly. but thats not the safety i'm t...rp... exactly. but thats not the safety i'm talkin bout which goes to another layer of the cake. <br /><br />however, i agree on your point. thats the legal argument and its valid in context of rights. and its right to defend that. <br /><br />probably the first declaration toward that was made in 1775 by the 2nd congress as the 'causes for the necessity to take up arms'. who were they making that declaration to though? as to the right, it was directed to their fellow 'gov by the people' people as 'fellow free men', officially declared a yr later by the same congress. as to the cause, it was to the king. <br /><br />who's the king now? that'd be the same gov we now declare cause to right? and the people are far from united. as you say, the grafetti is on the wall. we have every reason to be scared in this context. back in that day opportunity existed to make it a reasonably fair fight. not so today. <br /><br />i'm not saying acquiesce and give up the right but really, the basis of the argument is a moot point cuz we have no teeth. even if the military mutinied.<br /><br />there may be another revolution but it will be put down. fast!! thats the reality we're faced with as you've pointed out. <br /><br />so what do we do? i don't have a short term answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-44623242299079649942013-01-05T10:24:41.122-08:002013-01-05T10:24:41.122-08:00P;
Question is, safety from what?
The toters'...P;<br /><br />Question is, safety from what?<br /><br />The toters' position is that 2nd Amendment exists to allow the American people to be armed to some degree of parity with the government, because the founders felt, at some time in the future, we just might be oppressed by our government.<br /><br />Ta-dah! Here we are. Tasered. Groped. Listened-to. Our economy 's been destroyed by governmental and industrial criminals. With impunity. We debt slaves have lost our jobs, our houses and our means of production.<br /><br />And now DHS is buying hollow-point ammunition as fast as it can. What's that all about?<br /><br />The graffiti is on the wall, for anyone with eyes to read. "They" fully intend to disarm the American people, one way or another.<br /><br />Criminalization of gun-owners and confiscation is tantamount to civil war. If government is serious, and all indications are that now is the opportune time to move, then I feel we should expect full-spectrum dominance and ruthless behavior on the part of the feds, in order to insure a quick success.<br /><br />Confiscation may begin with a buy-back program, but before door-to-door maneuvers start, you can bet the power grid is going down. That will eliminate the opposition's, (our,) ability to communicate.<br /><br />So, prepare for that eventuality, at least mentally.6 dsxprec rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-21629275192647947082013-01-05T09:55:06.425-08:002013-01-05T09:55:06.425-08:00fa... more than a little grump seems to me more th...fa... more than a little grump seems to me more than called for.<br /><br />sats.. i can fully understand the the short 10 minute before the unbearable.<br /><br />rp... luved yer forever mantra.<br /><br />blogger... hate yer damn robot solution but, not as much as i hate the damn spammers... pAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-19933370723455717672013-01-05T09:24:23.116-08:002013-01-05T09:24:23.116-08:00re murph's post... i'm sure this comment d...re murph's post... i'm sure this comment does nothing to resolve the issue but what i see here is both sides are scared to death. but neither puts it in that context. its nothing new. thats been the driver all along.<br /><br />to the toters, safety is wrought at the end of a gun. to the baners, safety is no guns. neither are realistic. yet, both sides call this reality.<br /><br />happy new age everybody... pAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-70543514766900909032013-01-05T09:00:33.934-08:002013-01-05T09:00:33.934-08:00RP,
Perhaps the intention is to get folks out pan...RP,<br /><br />Perhaps the intention is to get folks out panic buying firearms and ammunition. And then take it all away. I can't believe that they are so disconnected from the greater society that they didn't know this would happen. They aren't that stupid. Are they?<br /><br />To my knowledge, none of the readers at this site were at Sandy Hook. So all of the narratives are going to be second hand or third hand information that is repeated by links. I covered a lot of that in the posting. I haven't seen anything new about it since.murphnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-70523490531262051572013-01-04T18:31:08.860-08:002013-01-04T18:31:08.860-08:00"...
Free your mind now while you can. Give i..."...<br />Free your mind now while you can. Give it a chance to thrive on its own without Wolf Blizter, Anderson Cooper, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddow and the others telling you what to think. You are better than these pre-approved mainstream corporate media talking heads, and you don’t need to know what their teleprompter is telling them to tell you. Your brain comes fully equipped with all the survival tools you will ever need to thrive while alive on this earth. Take this moment to end the teleprompter-brain circuit now and cut the line. You need only to make the choice..."<br /><br />-Bernie Suarez<br /><br />http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/creepy-world-of-mainstream-media.html<br /><br />I remember a reading comprehension test given to one of my junior high school classes sometime between the Kennedy murders. You might recognize the parameters, and recall taking the same exam. <br /><br />It consisted of a series of twenty, or so, commands. The first directive required the reader to peruse the entire list before performing any of the subsequent actions. The last command was to disregard all the above statements, except for the first one.<br /><br />Of course, as you can probably imagine, the twenty or so commands were designed to playfully emphasize upon us the consequences of not paying attention to detail.<br /><br />I remember reading down through the list of orders, such as, "bark like a dog," and listening to my classmates' woofs, and wondering, 'did I miss something? Should I be barking?'<br /><br />Fast forward fifty years, or so, and I'm still wondering if attention to detail trumps consensus group-think.<br /><br />On the evening news, reporters refer to unexamined, but official, narratives, in order to explain subsequent addenda to said narratives. Though the original story wobbles and leaks like a sieve, the shameful lamestream media goons pretend not to notice a hundred glaring inconsistencies no one in their profession feels any responsibility to clear up.<br /><br />This is a pattern we've learned to recognize and anticipate. Maybe that's why so little comment has been made on this site concerning Sandy Hook. Been there, done that.<br /><br />What pisses me off is how the media seems to assume the majority of its listeners buy its line. I think arms and ammunition sales would not be spiking through the roof if most people were swallowing the kool-aid.rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-51268020251134710212013-01-03T15:37:11.235-08:002013-01-03T15:37:11.235-08:00Here's a pretty jaw-dropping video about the c...Here's a pretty jaw-dropping video about the correlations between the Nazi take-over in Germany with what is going on here today.<br />[link to youtu.be] This guy, David VanDerBeek ran for governor of Nevada, apparently, but did not win. I think he is really courageous.freeacrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-49772622069362329002013-01-02T03:56:08.328-08:002013-01-02T03:56:08.328-08:00thks SATS, it seems the "awakening" thin...thks SATS, it seems the "awakening" thing originated with the "new agers" made popular in the 1900's by Alice Bailey, who is well wrapped up in originating a lot of the early NWO stuff. <br /><br />I wonder if proponents of the "spiritual awakening" (a lot of so called "truthers") realize this was started by architects of the NWO meme. <br /><br />Some clues here...<br /><br />http://www.wearechange.ie/pied-pipers-of-the-truth-movement-ii-ian-r-crane/ <br /><br />(if you can get over the christian fundamentalist spin) GdAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-66252702603163346152013-01-01T06:59:39.377-08:002013-01-01T06:59:39.377-08:00SATS
Let me know one way or the other how you get...SATS<br /><br />Let me know one way or the other how you get on with the film freeacre, hope you get as much out of it as I did. <br /><br />Gd, I think the calender came from the Mayans. I think astrophysical interpretations were discovered by astronomers and I think all the spiritual reawakening stuff was astrologer / Wickan / New Age types jumping on the bandwagon. Personally I thought the PTB were going to organise some event for the 21st to lower the curtain down on mankind and blame it on the Mayans. However we are here to live another day. I think the whole thing falls into the category of never let a good potential crisis go to waste. Its purpose was to give those who consider themselves informed, yet another thing to worry about. In a way it is similar to planet X and so on. A small verifiable fact is embellished out of all proportion to spread despondency to divert the informed from looking where they should be looking. People made much of the fact that the Mayans stopped at the end of the Long Count but nobody asked the question that once the Mayans had shown us how their calender worked then how many times should they have gone around the Long Count? <br /><br />If it is true, I think the exodus of top brass from Washington DC is more significant. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-88730776224543325292012-12-31T23:25:23.038-08:002012-12-31T23:25:23.038-08:00What say we kick this 2012 to the curb! Happy 201...What say we kick this 2012 to the curb! Happy 2013. I'm ready for a different year. Love to you all.freeacrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-31435724086614213662012-12-31T12:13:44.317-08:002012-12-31T12:13:44.317-08:00... " Freeacre, Pilar, mother, anchor, Venus...<br />... " Freeacre, Pilar, mother, anchor, Venus, nurse/protector, wise old grandmother and protector of us all; we will sit with you, and hold your hand, until the loud booming goes away. Forever."<br />Aw, Rockpicker, that is a great comfort. Thanks.<br /><br />Spirit, can't wait for you to view the Swedish version of the Millennium trilogy. I'm ordering the Unberable... right now.<br /><br />Man, I hate that we had to put the word verifier back in. is seems even worse than ever. Rats.<br /><br />freeacrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-79519041081874740332012-12-31T03:52:13.926-08:002012-12-31T03:52:13.926-08:00Gang: This "Awakening" meme; "spiri...Gang: This "Awakening" meme; "spiritual awakening" "transformation of consciousness" etc. we've all heard something along these lines, maybe connected to 2012, Mayans or something else. <br /><br />Question: Where is the origin of this meme? Who started it? And more ominously, is it part of an agenda?<br /><br />Gd Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-19905901518438973972012-12-29T03:50:58.134-08:002012-12-29T03:50:58.134-08:005SATS
I am with rp on this.
What a stupid time ...5SATS<br /><br />I am with rp on this. <br /><br />What a stupid time to make a typo. The film was called The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Briefly the heroine is deeply in love with a man who is a womaniser. He is holds his love for her on a high pedestal but regards sex with other women as a pastime like football which has nothing to do with love. She leaves him a note saying she is going away because instead of being his support she has become his weight and without her, he can be as light and free as he likes. That is the lightness of being part. But this lightness only lasts ten minutes before it is all over and that is the unbearable part. He then makes a life changing decision which completely alters his status and puts him in great personal risk. That is all I am going to tell you for now. <br /><br />Btw, On your recommendation I have just received the extended version of the Millennium Trilogy. I have not played it yet but I will let you know later.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-31991410378927499102012-12-29T03:21:25.258-08:002012-12-29T03:21:25.258-08:003 part piece from Dave Hodges: Gd
http://www.acti...3 part piece from Dave Hodges: Gd<br /><br />http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/ex-feds-and-wall-street-execs-are-going.html<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-1217972359850946892012-12-29T00:09:38.425-08:002012-12-29T00:09:38.425-08:00Freeacre, Pilar, mother, anchor, Venus, nurse/prot...Freeacre, Pilar, mother, anchor, Venus, nurse/protector, wise old grandmother and protector of us all; we will sit with you, and hold your hand, until the loud booming goes away. Forever.rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-82095286059693990682012-12-28T14:01:39.814-08:002012-12-28T14:01:39.814-08:00SATS
Well sister, I got there about a year ago. L...SATS<br /><br />Well sister, I got there about a year ago. Living in the doomosphere is a bit of a bummer so I decided to sprinkle life with a few more pleasurable things. It doesn't make the doom go away, you are always aware of it and are able to give give MSM events a personal twist. Now I am dipping my big toe in and out of the doom water. When you are not fluent in the language of the country where you live it makes participating in cohesive community a whole lot more difficult. The other day I was accused of speaking Vlengles. I said it was a beautiful language. Now I reckon to be one step ahead when things start to fall apart and just get on with my own stuff. Remember there is nothing wrong with panicking so long as you are not the second one to do it. <br /><br />I saw an old movie from 1988 yesterday which left me a little bit numb all day today. It is called "The Incredible Lightness of Being" Its partly erotic in the real sense, mostly a love story and partly documentary. It is set during the the time the Prague Spring was crushed. Did you know that making love in private is an act of rebellion because it is an act of defiance the authorities can't control :-), well that was one line from it. It is worth a watch if you can get it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-67646764078819317822012-12-28T11:39:50.440-08:002012-12-28T11:39:50.440-08:00Personally, I am experiencing a bad case of doom f...Personally, I am experiencing a bad case of doom fatigue. I have been anticipating collapses of finance, resources, and the environment for years now (as have you), and although it has partially happened, the lamestream is still mostly in denial. I have spent so much time compulsively reading about all this stuff, that I fear I have lost touch with the present. And, now there are commercials on the internet, which is why I stopped watching T.V. <br /> The freaking globalist agenda is reaching even into the daily affairs of a jerk-water place like La Pine, OR. I feel more and more like a peasant or a cooli. I know it is hard to believe, but I am becoming grumpy.<br /> The 2012 predictions have been a spectacular dud so far. Now I can't even count on one type of deterioration being replaced by disaster of another sort. Stuck with the same old creeping fascism and police state. What a bummer.<br /> I am still thinking that I have some modest control over my own life, and I want to include more pleasurable experiences. I want to go fishing, site-seeing, possibly creating some things, getting more exercise. I think that the difficulties in 2013 will be acute. But, fuck it. I intend to have some fun anyway.<br />ahofreeacrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-18344242946342708282012-12-27T17:12:20.552-08:002012-12-27T17:12:20.552-08:00Yeah, I'm afraid, too...Yeah, I'm afraid, too...rockpickerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15705284555868707898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-900671458188709604.post-79785831221048564552012-12-27T15:01:11.496-08:002012-12-27T15:01:11.496-08:00SATS
Yes, I have been in major companies who had ...SATS<br /><br />Yes, I have been in major companies who had a requirement to reassess their personnel portfolio (I used to be surrounded by this marketing junk language) and the first assault on the situation was to create a feeling of demoralisation and disillusion. It is a feeling of, they are bigger than you are and they are going get you in the end so why not jump ship before you are pushed overboard . But as you point out, if the problem is worldwide so where the hell are you going to go. I am sure all bases have already been covered and they are relying on gut reaction instead of a cool head. Even then it is hard to imagine what could be done against a problem so huge.<br /><br />As far as weapons go, it was the Russians who discovered that with nukes, the way to cause maximum loss of life with minimum fall out is to set them off underwater to cause a tsunami. Perhaps the most fearful thing about nukes is their stigma. There seems to be something so last year about them. I think there are beam weapons we know little about that can do a more effective job. This isn't very hopeful at all I'm afraid. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com