Monday, July 28, 2008

Part I Globalisation-Is Fighting Back Within The System Possible

Globalisation – The Nature of the Beast

from Belgium, alias-- Spirit Across The Sea


A month or more ago, after I came out of hibernation, Freeacre asked me to do a political post. At that time I had neither the time nor a subject to write about. Now I have decided to tackle arguably the biggest subject which is presently affecting all of our lives – Globalization. This is the first of a three part series. In this first part I want to explore the nature of the beast and then see what effects this has on the macro level. Part two will deal with the effect globalisation has on the individual level by looking at the daily life of a Chinese sweat shop worker. We will then go on to see how the product she makes is marketed world wide. Part three will begin by looking at how the biggest single player in the global market conducts its business (Can you guess who it is – clue, it is a US company) and we will end by discussing some measures organizations are taking to redress the balance point in the direction of the majority of the population.

This first part draws on extracts of a paper by Kevin Danaher “Globalization and the Downsizing of the American Dream”.

The Nature of Globalization

If we listen to those in the vanguard of the globalization movement we would be led to believe that all peoples of the world are being integrated into one great happy brotherhood of mankind. Growth and efficiency will provide happiness for all, well if only governments would stop interfering and just let market forces just get on with doing the job properly.

On the other side we see that manufacturing in industrialised countries of the west is being transferred to second and third world countries with corresponding loss of jobs. It is only too plain that if industrialists can cut their cost of sales by employing very much cheaper labour with small reductions in prices then they can pocket the difference. Nations with non existent safety and emissions standards are systematically poisoning a rape victim, mother earth. We see refugees and economic migrants by the millions roaming the planet seeking jobs and protection from armed conflict. We see large corporations like a cancer, eating up smaller companies and leaving the body of world society leaner and less able to cope. Gone are the days when a man could go out to work and support a household and large family. Now both partners have to work just fend off foreclosure. We are left with the gut feeling that it has all gone terribly wrong but it has happened so imperceptibly it is difficult to put your finger exactly on the where or when. The decline in our standard of living can be seen in numerous ways.

As US corporations have extended their global reach they have put the western work force in direct competition with second and third world countries so increasing their profits whilst at the same time driving down our wages and general standards of living.

Instead of technology providing the ‘leisure society’ where everybody enjoyed greater benefits whilst working fewer hours, corporations have used it to reduce their workforces thus causing anxiety over job security.

As global corporations become less-dependant on any particular nation, they have less interest in supporting any particular nation with taxes. This reduction in the fiscal tax base causes government expenses to outrace revenues.

By using the rationale of global competition to drive down the living standards of the majority, the corporate class has transferred more money from our pockets to theirs. This growing inequality is causing resentment and serious disquiet amongst those who are loosing ground.

The gradual wing clipping of labour unions who were always accused of “Holding the country to ransom” whenever they stood up for themselves has rendered them an ineffectual force making it easier for industrialists to do as they please.

Big Business Prefers to Deal with Dictatorships

Corporations have become so mighty that many of the Fortune 500 companies now have annual revenues greater than the GNP of most Third World countries and some in excess of industrialised Scandinavian and Baltic countries. For example, in 1995 General Motors received revenues equivalent to 19 million Americans earning the minimum wage. Such companies are making decisions with little regard for national boundaries and are therefore less dependent on any particular workforce. This does not stop them wanting to have their cake and eat it. Any subsidies offered will be snatched out of governments hand before the next corporation can get it but when it comes to any measures of reciprocation such as governmental or labour control, big business preaches free trade; deregulation and the downsizing of government. A truly democratic state is one of the greatest threats to big business and this is borne out in practice. Dictatorial states such as China and Indonesia are winning the battle for US export orders over the new democracies like Poland and South Africa. The New Economy Information Service (NEIS – a think tank set up to gauge the effects of globalisation), reported that at the end of the cold war in 1989, 53.4% of all US imports from Third World countries, excluding oil came from democracies. Now with more democracies to choose from, that figure has reduced to 34.9%. Speculating on why this should be so, NEIS said lower wages in dictatorships gave corporations an advantage. Also dictators can give quick decisions, deliver results and stamp out opposition. This is obviously a meeting of minds with many CEO’s. Dictators’, who have to answer to neither voters nor a legislature, can deliver investment incentives such as tax breaks, freedom from environmental laws and a docile work force. These are powerful lures for foreign corporations and whilst dictatorships are gaining market share, democracies are going steadily downhill.

After the fall of communism and whilst the former Yugoslavia was picking up the pieces following its various wars, the CEO of an automotive wiring loom company related that it was his companies intention to quit the UK, move to Romania for two years, collecting whatever subsidies it could get along the way and then dump the Romanians to relocate in Bosnia. This is just one example of corporate thought processes.

Having said this, not every large corporation which outsources is intrinsically disreputable. Airbus, the plane maker, wanted to keep its operation within Europe but has been forced to obtain components from further afield because its international contracts are priced in dollars and with the steady tanking of the dollar it must either outsource or renege on its contracts. This is a little bit self-inflicted since the devaluing of the dollar had been predicted for some time. If others knew the dollar was on a slide how did the smart accountants and lawyers of Airbus overlook this? The clever thing would have been to peg a dollar / Euro rate for the date each contract was signed, a bit like a fixed rate mortgage. They might not have made so much as they might have but at least they would have been safe. This is always a danger for companies who manufacture relatively small amounts of high value articles. It is reassuring to know that the big guys can sometimes come unstuck, although it is large sections of the workforce who have again been handed the dirty end of the stick.

The unnerving effect of US workers being placed in direct competition with Third World Dictatorships has had severe consequences at home. Average real wages, corrected for inflation, have been falling since their peak in the early 1970’s. By 1992 earnings in the non agricultural part of the economy were 19% lower. One quarter of the US workforce now earns less in real terms than the 1968 minimum wage! On the other side of the coin, massive layoffs have been accompanied by top CEO salaries soaring to 200 times that of an average worker. In 1996 the magazine Newsweek ran a hard hitting cover story entitled “Corporate Killers” in which they said “Something is plain wrong when stock prices keep rising on Wall Street while Main Street is littered with the bodies of workers discarded by big companies. Once upon a time it was a mark of shame to fire your workers en masse. Today the more workers a company fires the more Wall Street loves it and the higher its stock price goes”. In recent times transnational corporations have gotten basically everything they wanted: the collapse of communism; free trade agreements; deregulation; lower taxes; the weakening of trade unions and the pushing down of wage rates. Yet while profits and the stock market soar the standard of living for most Americans is plummeting. It should be remembered that it is now commonplace for a CEOs package to be partly made up of stock options so they are financially benefiting from decisions which inflict suffering on great numbers of American families.

Some years ago we were told that automation would benefit all. With machines to do the work and increase productivity we could enjoy higher wages with less input. The leisure society was about to explode on us. But the technology turned against us and now companies see it as a way to dump workers who make demands and question authority and replace them with machines which have never been known to form a union. Over the last 30 years employment in the US manufacturing sector has halved from 33% to 17% of the workforce even though output has steadily increased over the same period.

Will the Service Sector Absorb Jobs Lost by Manufacturing?

Contrary to popular opinion the service sector will not pick up all the jobs lost by the manufacturing sector. Even allowing for the fact that pay is usually lower here, service sector jobs are also being lost to technology. There are many examples of this: Computer program coding, a highly skilled and once sought after profession is now largely done in India and results posted over the internet; optical scanners have eliminated large sections of postal workers and in the ten years following 1983, banks replaced 179,000 human tellers with ATM machines. The result is wide spread insecurity that saps worker morale. Another factor adding to the malaise is that with an increased potential workforce chasing fewer jobs, employers can pick highly qualified people for increasingly menial positions thus simultaneously providing worker dissatisfaction and devaluing the qualification. Consequently, many have asked Uncle Sam to take them as a new recruit; to become a cannon fodder professional. But even though there are no shortages of military adventures to take part in, many are wising up to their leaderships true motives and sitting on their hands.

Like many governments with unpopular news the US government masks the true level of unemployment by defining it away. Instead of defining it as the number of people who want a job but can’t find one, it does not count those who are so discouraged they have stopped looking and counts 30million part time workers as full time. In 1994 this brought the percentages down from 15.9% to 6.1%. Every company can justify shedding its workers but when all these drips in the bucket are added up the result is economic stagnation. Many women adversely affected by this economic treading of water are staying home unwilling to take available work at sometimes half their previous salary.

The Casino Economy

Another dynamic in play by those with money to invest, is the shift away from building up the infrastructure of the country, opening factories, hotels, restaurants and the like to investing in the so called casino economy. By buying into in stocks, bonds and other financial instruments a profit can be made without the hassles associated with production. Not only that

but stocks and bonds are more readily converted to cash as more lucrative speculation presents itself. This is not so easily accomplished if you have set up a factory or a restaurant chain. One step further removed from directly investing in financial instruments is the derivatives market. Whereas the working classes bet on horses, dogs or the outcome of football matches, the upper echelons bet on whether one financial instrument or currency will rise or fall in value relative to some other over a given period of time. The annual value of global merchandise trade is about $4 trillion. The global derivatives market equals this dollar value in just two days. The shift of investments away from the real economy to the casino economy has weakened the power of governments to control national economies and protect peoples’ jobs.

The US Congress and the media, when it chooses to address such things, have focussed our attention on the spending side of the ledger but monies coming into the government are equally as important. When there are less active workers in the economy the demand for government services such as unemployment benefit and other forms of income support increases in a direct relationship to revenues receivable drying up. Innovations over the years in computerised communication allow financiers to transfer billions of dollars around the world instantly and the next day the same billions of dollars are invested somewhere else in the world. This makes it exceedingly difficult for governments to tax such transactions. Even though the rich are becoming increasingly rich and the poor are becoming increasingly poor, taxes received from companies have fallen from 76 cents for every dollar received from individuals in 1950, to 21 cents today. From this it is clear where monies to support infrastructure are coming from. Even so, the government could not put this entire burden on the collective ‘us’. Therefore in order to support the infrastructure; it has borrowed from the capital markets, in other words taxing our children and grandchildren. But here we have a situation which is self compounding. One generation will need to put the next two generations in debt and that generation the next four or so. It is clear that this will never be sustainable. During the 1990’s two trillion dollars was redistributed up the social ladder in interest payments to those who own the national debt.

Contrary to what the GOP has been preaching, it is not big government which has been undermining Main Street USA. Rather Main Street is being undermined by the fact that the US government is dominated by moneyed interests and these are increasingly global, owing no allegiance to any particular country.


Globalisation and the Downsizing of the American Dream:

From Global Exchange - By Kevin Danaher

Wiring Looms to be made in Romania and then Bosnia:

Related personally by automotive exec seconded to Lucas Industries

Airbus outsources components:

BBC World Service news item

US Corporations Prefer Dictatorships:

From Global Exchange – By R.C. Longworth


freeacre said...

Outstanding post, Spirit Across the Sea! Well documented, and cogent, you articulate the crisis we are in very clearly. The underlying complicity of the greater population in purchasing the products that rely on servitude or slavery or dictatorships is so very disturbing to me. From buying the cotton from slave labor plantations, the "blood diamonds" at jewelry stores, the bananas from the United Fruit Company, to cheap electronics do-dads, and clothing at Walmart, the denial
of exploiting the workers in these hell holes and the effects on the animals and planet continues to this day. Once again, I have relegated the Elaine Bryant catalog that comes in the mail to the garbage.
We look with amazement at the pyramids, the castles, the palaces built by the ruling classes in the distant past while the peasants suffered and starved. But the mansions and second (or third or more) homes that the hedge fund managers, CEO's, and banksters are featured in Sunset Magazine with nary a whisper of contempt for their ostentatious displays of ill-gotten gains.
I had not put it together that so-called democratic nations should put their money where their mouth is and financially support democratic nations over dictatorships. Of course we should. It is an outrage that we don't. Of course, it's more than a little difficult now that we have sold our national debt to totalitarian states.
I look forward to your next two posts to help us get clear on what is happening.

Anonymous said...

A most excellent post Belgium!!!

I have just taken a first glance and you can be assured I will re read in earnest when time permits but I can say that you are speaking a lot of truths on this one...


Anonymous said...

Good post. but I thought I read that the average CEO's pay was 425 times more than that of his lesser-human being, scumbag employee?


Anonymous said...

From Belgium,


That's inflation for you.

RAS said...

Damn good post Belgium. My question is, how can we help tear down this stupid, ridiculous, unethical, murdering system?
Oh, excuse me, my prozac stopped working for a second. Where was I? Oh yeah, I need to go to the mall to buy...something. See you later.

Seriously, though. Sometimes I get so frustrated I could bang my head against the wall.

I'm putting my house on the market next week. I intend to get out while the gettin's good and I can. What I'll do after it sells (assuming it does) I haven't worked out yet. I'll do that when I find out what I'm getting for it.

Any prayers, good thoughts, intonations, etc, are very, very welcome.

Anonymous said...

Wow I'm impressed this site is always a cut above thanks to freeacre and murph and now to Belgium Spirit Across the Sea you are spot on with what is needed. And FA's comment was delicious as well...I knew I had a love hate relationship with overly commercialized Sunset Mag. I have been a guilty one and in recent years become more aware in my purchases, etc. it's all so devious. Also the U.S. Big Pharma and the W.H.O. is doing a lot of harm in those 3rd world countries disquised as good. It's so depressing the state the world is in but excellent how you are calling it out. As a country, our late education and lack of it has come at a dear price. I have no doubts that we are in an irriversable collapse W.W. There's going to be hell to pay and I hope the "little people" will stick together. The largest bummer factor is how so many are in the dark and not only misinformed but down right lied to 24-7. Seems like only half will have the inclination to seek out truths. Your thoughts and points here only further the learning process that is so desparately needed. Even for those who are conscious and seeking the info it is so important to spread these truths and conjure these ideas and thoughts. Good Read! mrsp

Anonymous said...

P.S.: I'm revolting! <---actually am sometimes...oh well you know what I mean.

David Kendall said...

This is a very well written article, concisely outlining problems that hundreds of others have belabored for several years -- nay decades. Conspicuously missing, however, is discussion of any sort of solution(s). Most of the articles I've seen are comprised of at least 95-percent "problem" and usually far less than 5-percent "solution".

The title of this article asks a direct question: "Is Fighting Back Within The System Possible (?)".

What is the answer to this question? This is actually an essential question that deserves far more than a "Yes" or "No" answer. I realize there are two more installments yet to come. This means you've already exhausted 33-percent of your article in defining the problem. How much do you plan to devote to proposed solutions?

Anonymous said...

From Belguim,

Thanks for the accolades everybody (shucks)!

To answer David’s specific question, two thirds of part three, there is a lot more of the problem still to come! I intend to only deal with what is actually going on now to address the problem and not go into the la-la land of super hero flying over the horizon. Unfortunately, many are just coming out of their slumbers. If I find more stuff in the meantime I still have time to put it in.

murph said...


Working within the system I think is non productive. Without an outright collapse and imploding of the economy, the only way I see to bring these people down is not buy from them. Working through political channels flat out isn't going to get us anywhere. We missed our chance back in the 60's and 70's but people were sold a bill of goods, and now we pay the price.

murph said...


I think I have read stats too that show a 400:1 ratio of CEO pay. Whatever it is, it sure ain't egalitarian.

murph said...


You certainly have our well wishes in you endeavor. Sure hope it works out well for you.

murph said...


Is that called a double entendre'? (or how ever you spell it) lol

RAS said...

Mrs. P, I agree with you: let's all revolt!

Gas has gone down so much I saved $.21 today over my last fill-up. A full 21 cents! Gee golly whiz, whatsoever will I do with my savings?

I told some people I was planning to sell the house, and they told me I should go grit my teeth and do engineering work for the military for I should do that. I tried not to laugh in their faces. That's not an option because a) I won't kill people for a living, b) I got fired from my last "good job" because I refused to kill people for a living and thus have a record, c) I can't get a security clearance (see above, plus debt, plus the fact that I feel pretty much NO loyalty to our current government), and d) 6 months working in a cube would send me to the looney bin. It nearly did, once before.

I would rather live in a tent by the river.

Anonymous said...

a really great job b. i was particularly taken with the casino part since i've been wondering just what that ratio might be. i've got a pretty good imagination and pretty high tolerance for pain but thats just mind boggling!! i didn't check out the sources but i'd guess somebody crunched some hard numbers to come up with that. which means the reality is even a greater spread... probably far greater for a number of reasons not the least of which is the same reason govts can't catch up with the movement fast enough to tax it before poof... its gone. there's a whole lotta dough off book and a whole lotta money movement thats not on the radar. BIG money. jeykel and hyde accounting. bullion banks leasing each other gold back and forth so fast nobody can figure out whats going on unless you got the password to the software they're using. and that number is pocket change in the larger view.

dave's question aside, the next obvious question is why the hell would the monster want to eat its own tail? i was going to say heart but this monster ain't got one. the part thats really hard to deal with is we're part of it. if there ever was such a thing as a collective heart it got gobbled up long ago. now all thats left is the head and the tail and we know which end we're on eh?

i'm with murph... the system produces its own poison. its not limited to the political and economic systems that have become so enmeshed its hard to tell where one leaves off and the other begins anymore. so i'm real curious about the solution knowing full well that what we see is a reflection of our own making. what are we gonna do when the first person takes out a put or call option on it?

speaking of solutions we had a discussion going in the last thread that was kinda left hangin. some of you may think it was a dead issue before it ever got started. and though i could connect it all up in the context of b's excellent post and subsequent comments here, i think the better judgement is to leave it where it is. at least for the time being. it ended with ras answering a question i had posed. i've just posted a comment back and i hope you will all go back and take a look cuz we have a real contradiction going here unless i totally misunderstand what she is saying. hopefully we won't get into anything near as heated as the amount of heat it would take to "literally burn" nutrients. murph's comment deserves comment as well. but we'll see where this goes first... ydndee

Anonymous said...

NO....The system is rigged and fighting back is futile.
Now recall all those thoughts that led you to write this very long opinion. Take a long had look at those thoughts and recognize them for what they are.
Then move on.

Anonymous said...

From Belgium,

Anon 10.02, that is Murph’s view too. He has done the protesting whilst things got worse and would now prefer to do something productive and sustainable with his time, like gardening rather than being an antagonist to what you call ‘the rigged system’.

Which side of the fence am I coming down on? You will have to wait another two episodes to find out. But standing up to show how you feel is never a bad thing. After the youthful exuberance of the Seattle Ministerial protest, the Miami Ministerial protest was made up of a greater ground swell cross section of the public. For instance as well as students, labour unions; veterans and business people were also represented. Will civil disobedience as is called, increase as the situation worsens or will the effects of the Military Commissions Act have their intended effect? Who is to say? But as the light dims on the Bush administration, the decider’s decisions are being increasingly ignored. Some, I will grant you not many at the moment, Guantanamo Bay inmates have been brought to trial; judges are allowing Habeas Corpus even though it is now illegal. Is this the beginning of the rift or are we really all doomed? Only time will tell and as you rightly say, my very long opinion will hardly make a difference although human curiosity might intrigue people enough to look at the number on the bus that is about to hit them and they may even have enough wherewithal to jump to the side as it goes wooshing past.

Anonymous said...

Can you fight an illusion with the products of that same illusion?
Perhaps there is a weapon that can be used.
Is this
a clue?
The spirits around the campfire are humming a new tune???

Anonymous said...

From Belgium,

Anon 5.55

Thanks for the comment, pull up a log and sit down. I have seen that Anastasia thing before and wondered why a movement that is so great had gone undetected in the west for so long. If the Russians really are doing it then all credit to them. But tell me what illusion is it that you imagine that I am under? That I think the present system is sustainable or unsustainable, or something else? I haven’t passed an opinion, I don’t think, all I have said is what the system is at present and what are its effects, which are mostly facts. If you go back a few posts we were talking about Eleanor Roosevelt’s Dig for Victory campaign during WWII, where many Americans dug up their lawns and planted vegetables but then came along Wally World with their everyday low prices and suddenly digging the garden wasn’t worth the ass anymore. It is a pity but that’s what happened. Please stay around and join the discussion, I am sure others will have thoughts on your comments.

Anonymous said...

as illusion should go, this sure is real!

anastasia as a weapon? somehow that feels like one of dem oxy-morons! we've already played this tune. many times. maybe the only way to win is not to play the game?

it appears anastasia may have company 'mongst the nations of the eagle and the condor...

here's the part i like... "in serpent of light, drunvalo melchchizedek tells the story of indiginous people around the world creating ceremonies to relocate the kundalini serpent to the high andes mountains of chile... "

the spokesman, drunvalo, is one of them self-proclaimed walk-ins though. so the message may have no credibility with the needie... the idea is just...
oooooooooouuuuuuuutt thhhhhhhhhhheeeeeerrrrrree

... xzsnudw

freeacre said...

Ok, Wild Bunch, we seem to be having about 3 conversations going on at once here. I'm getting confused, but then, it's not the first time...

I would counsel to keep in mind that we are not here to evaluate each other's thoughts so much as to share them. Everybody has a little piece of the whole, and we make up our own minds as to which way we connect the dots.

Anybody seen the 30 year old video of Jack Nicholson's hydrogen car? It's on today's cryptogon. What a shame that innovations like that were put on the back burner. We might have worked out the kinks by now.

If millions of Russians are producing the majority of food without agri-business, that's astounding! I'm more than willing to take a look at their techniques. Don't know about the religious aspect of it, but, hey, it can't be worse than a lot of what has been come up with so far. Hard to imagine hard-drinking Russians cavorting around in the woods, but then, i would have never envisioned the Russian Army singing "Sweet Home Alabama, either!

Concerning globalization, Urban Survival has a link today that points to indications that there may be a big shift in China's economic policies after the Olympics that will affect pretty much everyone, since we are so dependent on products made there.

murph said...

anon 9:01 am

I suspect in all the "great ancient secrets", myths and legends there is a grain of truth at least, maybe more.

The alcohol debate continues on the previous post. lol

Jacques de Beaufort said...